On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 18:40 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 11:57 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > I guess it's arguable whether that's more or less horrible than adding an
> > #ifdef'ed booted_from_kexec check, but I think I'd prefer the
> > spinning_secondaries solution.
>
> W
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 11:57 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 15:25 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 14:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Hi Scott,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the delay. So I'm back to square one on this patch.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2015-07-18
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 15:25 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 14:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay. So I'm back to square one on this patch.
> >
> > On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 15:08 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > booted_from_exec is similar to _
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 14:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Sorry for the delay. So I'm back to square one on this patch.
>
> On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 15:08 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > booted_from_exec is similar to __run_at_load, except that it is set for
> > regular kexec as well a
Hi Scott,
Sorry for the delay. So I'm back to square one on this patch.
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 15:08 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> booted_from_exec is similar to __run_at_load, except that it is set for
> regular kexec as well as kdump.
>
> The flag is needed because the SMP release mechanism for FS
booted_from_exec is similar to __run_at_load, except that it is set for
regular kexec as well as kdump.
The flag is needed because the SMP release mechanism for FSL book3e is
different from when booting with normal hardware. In theory we could
simulate the normal spin table mechanism, but not at
