On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 16:41, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 02:10:29PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > The CPU field will be moved back into thread_info even when
> > THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled, so add it back to arm64's definition of
> > struct thread_info.
> >
> > Sign
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 02:10:29PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The CPU field will be moved back into thread_info even when
> THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled, so add it back to arm64's definition of
> struct thread_info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas
On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 17:41, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 5:10 AM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > The CPU field will be moved back into thread_info even when
> > THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled, so add it back to arm64's definition of
> > struct thread_info.
>
> The series loo
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 5:10 AM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> The CPU field will be moved back into thread_info even when
> THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled, so add it back to arm64's definition of
> struct thread_info.
The series looks sane to me, but it strikes me that it's inconsistent
- here for ar
The CPU field will be moved back into thread_info even when
THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled, so add it back to arm64's definition of
struct thread_info.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 ins
