On Tue Mar 7, 2023 at 3:37 PM AEST, Benjamin Gray wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 15:05 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > I think it is not quite per-process? I don't actually know how the
> > user
> > toolchain side is put together, but I'm thinking we can not give it a
> > new
> > salt on fork(),
On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 15:05 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> I think it is not quite per-process? I don't actually know how the
> user
> toolchain side is put together, but I'm thinking we can not give it a
> new
> salt on fork(), but we could on exec(). I think we could actually
> give
> each threa
On Mon Nov 28, 2022 at 12:44 PM AEST, Benjamin Gray wrote:
> The ISA 3.1B hashst and hashchk instructions use a per-cpu SPR HASHKEYR
> to hold a key used in the hash calculation. This key should be different
> for each process to make it harder for a malicious process to recreate
> valid hash value
The ISA 3.1B hashst and hashchk instructions use a per-cpu SPR HASHKEYR
to hold a key used in the hash calculation. This key should be different
for each process to make it harder for a malicious process to recreate
valid hash values for a victim process.
Add support for storing a per-thread hash
