On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:10:11 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan
wrote:
> I know kernel summit is going on, so I'll be patient, but was just
> curious if anyone had any further comments other than Christoph's on the
> naming.
Nope. Please make a decision on the naming, refresh, retest and resend
and I'l
On 13.08.2014 [17:13:01 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Anton noticed (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg67489.html) that
> on ppc LPARs with memoryless nodes, a large amount of memory was
> consumed by slabs and was marked unreclaimable. He tracked it down to
> slab deactivations in th
Anton noticed (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg67489.html) that
on ppc LPARs with memoryless nodes, a large amount of memory was
consumed by slabs and was marked unreclaimable. He tracked it down to
slab deactivations in the SLUB core when we allocate remotely, leading
to poor efficiency a
