Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-31 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Timur, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:02:21PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > >> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, > >> thus > >> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. > >> > >> Cc: Kumar

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-31 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Scott, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:20:33PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:56:53 + > Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > > > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, > > > thus > > > bre

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-29 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Tabi, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:56:53PM +, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, > > thus > > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. > > > > Cc: Kumar Gala > >

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-28 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:56:53 + Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, > > thus > > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. > > > > Cc: Kumar Gala > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-28 Thread Timur Tabi
wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: >> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, >> thus >> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. >> >> Cc: Kumar Gala >> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach >> --- >> Is this the right approach? > > It

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-28 Thread Tabi Timur-B04825
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. > > Cc: Kumar Gala > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach > --- > Is this the right approach? It doesn't work for me. I n

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-11 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Kumar, On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 07:56:10AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. Ping? Ack/Nack? baruch > Cc: Kumar Gala > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach > --- > Is this the rig

[RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-06-19 Thread Baruch Siach
CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. Cc: Kumar Gala Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach --- Is this the right approach? arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(