On Sat Apr 18, 2020 at 12:27 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Le 15/04/2020 à 18:22, Christopher M Riedl a écrit :
> >> On April 15, 2020 4:12 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 15/04/2020 à 07:16, Christopher M Riedl a écrit :
> On March 26, 2020 9:42 AM Christophe Leroy
Le 15/04/2020 à 18:22, Christopher M Riedl a écrit :
On April 15, 2020 4:12 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 15/04/2020 à 07:16, Christopher M Riedl a écrit :
On March 26, 2020 9:42 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
This patch fixes the RFC series identified below.
It fixes three points:
-
> On April 15, 2020 4:12 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 15/04/2020 à 07:16, Christopher M Riedl a écrit :
> >> On March 26, 2020 9:42 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> This patch fixes the RFC series identified below.
> >> It fixes three points:
> >> - Failure with CONFIG_PPC_K
Le 15/04/2020 à 07:16, Christopher M Riedl a écrit :
On March 26, 2020 9:42 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
This patch fixes the RFC series identified below.
It fixes three points:
- Failure with CONFIG_PPC_KUAP
- Failure to write do to lack of DIRTY bit set on the 8xx
- Inadequaly complex WA
> On March 26, 2020 9:42 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> This patch fixes the RFC series identified below.
> It fixes three points:
> - Failure with CONFIG_PPC_KUAP
> - Failure to write do to lack of DIRTY bit set on the 8xx
> - Inadequaly complex WARN post verification
>
> However, it has an
This patch fixes the RFC series identified below.
It fixes three points:
- Failure with CONFIG_PPC_KUAP
- Failure to write do to lack of DIRTY bit set on the 8xx
- Inadequaly complex WARN post verification
However, it has an impact on the CPU load. Here is the time
needed on an 8xx to run the ftra
