On 04/07/2023 11:11, Tobias Huschle wrote:
> On 2023-05-16 18:35, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 15/05/2023 13:46, Tobias Huschle wrote:
>>> The current load balancer implementation implies that scheduler groups,
>>> within the same scheduler domain, all host the same number of CPUs.
>>>
>>> This ap
On 2023-05-16 18:35, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
On 15/05/2023 13:46, Tobias Huschle wrote:
The current load balancer implementation implies that scheduler
groups,
within the same scheduler domain, all host the same number of CPUs.
This appears to be valid for non-s390 architectures. Nevertheless,
On 15/05/2023 13:46, Tobias Huschle wrote:
> The current load balancer implementation implies that scheduler groups,
> within the same scheduler domain, all host the same number of CPUs.
>
> This appears to be valid for non-s390 architectures. Nevertheless, s390
> can actually have scheduler grou
The current load balancer implementation implies that scheduler groups,
within the same scheduler domain, all host the same number of CPUs.
This appears to be valid for non-s390 architectures. Nevertheless, s390
can actually have scheduler groups of unequal size.
The current scheduler behavior ca
