On 04/02/2014 06:13 AM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> > This patch adds few more ptrace request macros expanding
>> > the existing capability. These ptrace requests macros can
>> > be classified into two categories.
> Why is this only an RFC?
>
Looking for comments, sugges
Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This patch adds few more ptrace request macros expanding
> the existing capability. These ptrace requests macros can
> be classified into two categories.
Why is this only an RFC?
Also, please share the test case that you wrote for this.
Mikey
>
> (1) Transactional
This patch adds few more ptrace request macros expanding
the existing capability. These ptrace requests macros can
be classified into two categories.
(1) Transactional memory
/* TM special purpose registers */
PTRACE_GETTM_SPRREGS
PTRACE_SETTM_SPRREGS
/* Checkpoin