On Thursday 21 August 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> Yes, I heard of it. tglx told me that the IP-Core might show up in
> non-IBM HW and it would be better not to drop the platform support.
Thomas, any example of that? I would guess that all powerpc and microblaze
systems would use the of_platfo
* Arnd Bergmann | 2008-08-21 00:40:58 [+0200]:
>On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
>> I didn't convert the NDFC driver to support OF because there are
>> non-OF-aware platforms with the ndfc chip.
>> All settings are mandatory except the oob layout.
>
>Are you aware of Sean's pa
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:37:19 -0400
"Josh Boyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:40:58 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> > > I didn't convert the NDFC driver to support OF because there are
> > > non
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:40:58 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> > I didn't convert the NDFC driver to support OF because there are
> > non-OF-aware platforms with the ndfc chip.
> > All settings are mandatory except the oob layo
On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> I didn't convert the NDFC driver to support OF because there are
> non-OF-aware platforms with the ndfc chip.
> All settings are mandatory except the oob layout.
Are you aware of Sean's patch from
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id
I didn't convert the NDFC driver to support OF because there are
non-OF-aware platforms with the ndfc chip.
All settings are mandatory except the oob layout.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Siewior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig |7 ++
drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile |1 +
drivers
