Hollis Blanchard writes:
> Hi, I wrote this patch for KVM [1], but now that I look closer it seems
> like there might be some overlapping functionality.
Looks OK -
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
subject to you writing a suitable patch description. :)
Paul.
___
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 12:21 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 13:55 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Hollis Blanchard writes:
> >
> > > I've also found xmon's ppc-opc.c. That parses the opcode and operands,
> > > so could use some shared macros.
> >
> > That's a direct copy f
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 13:55 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Hollis Blanchard writes:
>
> > I've also found xmon's ppc-opc.c. That parses the opcode and operands,
> > so could use some shared macros.
>
> That's a direct copy from GNU binutils. I'm reluctant to modify it
> because then maintenance
Hollis Blanchard writes:
> I've also found xmon's ppc-opc.c. That parses the opcode and operands,
> so could use some shared macros.
That's a direct copy from GNU binutils. I'm reluctant to modify it
because then maintenance becomes more than just copying in the latest
version.
Paul.
__
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Hi, I wrote this patch for KVM [1], but now that I look closer it seems
like there might be some overlapping functionality.
First there's emulate_instruction(), but since that only handles a few
instructions it's just an ordered list of if ((instruction & MASK_A) ==
INST_
Hi, I wrote this patch for KVM [1], but now that I look closer it seems
like there might be some overlapping functionality.
First there's emulate_instruction(), but since that only handles a few
instructions it's just an ordered list of if ((instruction & MASK_A) ==
INST_A) tests, so it doesn't ac
