On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:47:19AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
How is this as a fix.
- k
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/
platforms/85xx/Kconfig
index 7ff29d5..9e5c884 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kcon
On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:00, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:47:19AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
How is this as a fix.
- k
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/
platforms/85xx/Kconfig
index 7ff29d5..9e5c884 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:31, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
If you just #ifdef PHYLIB, then things will break if the user does
this:
make config, GIANFAR=PHYLIB=n
make zImage
make config, GIANFAR=PHYLIB=m
make modules
And the cause of the failure will not b
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:47:19AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> How is this as a fix.
>
> - k
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
> index 7ff29d5..9e5c884 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx
Kumar Gala wrote:
I see. However, I don't like the idea I have to build in the PHYLIB
if I don't need it at all.
Understood, but in practice I don't think the 10K or so matters that
much on a typical 85xx board, and if the user really needs to trim
things down, they always have the option of m
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
I'd rather avoid adding another case where the kernel needs to
know what modules are being built, though, especia
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
I'd rather avoid adding another case where the kernel needs to know
what modules are being built, though, especially if the result of
changing the .config and buil
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
I'd rather avoid adding another case where the kernel needs to
know what modules are being built, though, especially if the
result of changing the .config and building modules is
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
I'd rather avoid adding another case where the kernel needs to know
what modules are being built, though, especially if the result of
changing the .config and building modules is a mysterious runtime
failure (due to a missing pla
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
How is this as a fix.
- k
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/
platforms/85xx/Kconfig
index 7ff29d5..9e5c884 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
Kumar Gala wrote:
How is this as a fix.
- k
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
index 7ff29d5..9e5c884 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ config MPC85xx_MDS
bool
How is this as a fix.
- k
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
index 7ff29d5..9e5c884 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ config MPC85xx_MDS
bool "Freescale MPC85xx
12 matches
Mail list logo
