>
> Cute. I didn't know this was possible. I'll give it a try and see
> how it works for me. Do override config options also pickup
> select/depends constraints applied by later definitions? I think that
> would be necessary to kick out warnings when a defconfig selection
> isn't actually achi
Hi Sam,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:37:06AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> This is a fairly brute force approach to allowing a Kconfig "select"
>> to specify an excplicit value for the selected config sybmol.
>>
>> The syntax of select is c
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:37:06AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> This is a fairly brute force approach to allowing a Kconfig "select"
> to specify an excplicit value for the selected config sybmol.
>
> The syntax of select is changed to:
>
> "select" [] ["if" expr]
>
> The approach tak
This is a fairly brute force approach to allowing a Kconfig "select"
to specify an excplicit value for the selected config sybmol.
The syntax of select is changed to:
"select" [] ["if" expr]
The approach taken is to add a list of
pairs to the symbol and check them whenever the reverse
