On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 3:33 pm Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 09:36 -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
> > > Ayman, can you double check that this variant of the patch still
> > > fixes your problem ? Thanks !
> >
> > I've tried it out and it is working correctly with my de
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 09:36 -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
> > Ayman, can you double check that this variant of the patch still
> > fixes your problem ? Thanks !
> >
>
> I've tried it out and it is working correctly with my devices. The
> subordinate bus numbers on all the ports are correct.
Th
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Ayman, can you double check that this variant of the patch still
> fixes your problem ? Thanks !
>
I've tried it out and it is working correctly with my devices. The
subordinate bus numbers on all the ports are correct.
Best Regards,
Ayman
___
On Monday, October 20, 2008 4:06 pm Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Some firmware fail to properly configure P2P bridges, leaving them
> with invalid bus numbers. In some cases, this happens on some embedded
> 4xx boards as the result of the kernel allocating different bus space
> than the firmware
Some firmware fail to properly configure P2P bridges, leaving them
with invalid bus numbers. In some cases, this happens on some embedded
4xx boards as the result of the kernel allocating different bus space
than the firmware does to host bridges while not setting
pcibios_assign_all_busses() for va