Nathan Lynch wrote:
> (very rfc for now, no sign-off, needs more testing)
>
> There are a couple of bugs in the rtas_ibm_suspend_me() and
> rtas_percpu_suspend_me() functions:
>
> 1. rtas_ibm_suspend_me() uses on_each_cpu() to invoke
> rtas_percpu_suspend_me() via IPI:
>
> if (on_each_cpu(rtas_
> -for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> -plpar_hcall_norets(H_PROD,i);
...
> +for_each_online_cpu(i)
> +plpar_hcall_norets(H_PROD, get_hard_smp_processor_id(i));
I assume this bit would be non-contriversial and could be sent up for
immediate upstream in
(very rfc for now, no sign-off, needs more testing)
There are a couple of bugs in the rtas_ibm_suspend_me() and
rtas_percpu_suspend_me() functions:
1. rtas_ibm_suspend_me() uses on_each_cpu() to invoke
rtas_percpu_suspend_me() via IPI:
if (on_each_cpu(rtas_percpu_suspend_me, &data, 1, 0))
...
