Hi Jochen,
Firstly, you should probably cc Dave Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
anything in drivers/of as Sparc is the other user of this stuff (just in
case they are interested).
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:46:41 +0100 Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +++ b/drivers/of/i2c.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,
Hi Jean,
>> What is the preferred way to do this?
>
> I still have to think about it. I didn't have much time to work on this
> during the last 2 weeks, hopefully I will fine some time to experiment
> again soon. As I underlined before, my patch set affects no less than 5
> subsystems with differ
Hi Olof,
> And even if you DO decide to go that route, guess what? You need a
> translation table just as with (3) anyway!
True.
3. use a glue layer with a translation map.
>>> In my opinion this is an OK solution since the same information has to
>>> be added somewhere already anyway -- ei
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:16:30PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Olof,
>
> >> 2. record the I2c name in the dts tree, either as seperate tag (like
> >> linux,i2c-name="")
> >>or as additional compatible entry (like compatible="...",
> >> "linux,").
> >
> > I have to say no on thi
On 2/22/08, Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
>
> >> +/*
> >> + * Wait for patch from Jon Smirl
> >> + * #include "powerpc-common.h"
> >> + */
> >
> > It doesn't make sense to merge this comment upstream.
>
>
> I know you don't like the patch from Jon Smirl and you also
Hi Olof,
>> 2. record the I2c name in the dts tree, either as seperate tag (like
>> linux,i2c-name="")
>>or as additional compatible entry (like compatible="...",
>> "linux,").
>
> I have to say no on this one. The device tree is not supposed to know
> about how linux uses devices, there ar
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:16:16PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Fortunately, I2c no longer uses numeric device IDs but names. So what are the
> alternatives?
>
> 1. modify the I2c subsystem to accept OF names additionally to I2c names
> (proposed by Jon smirl).
Sounds like Jean isn't very
Hi Jochen,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:16:16 +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> >> +/*
> >> + * Wait for patch from Jon Smirl
> >> + * #include "powerpc-common.h"
> >> + */
> >
> > It doesn't make sense to merge this comment upstream.
>
> I know you don't like the patch from Jon Smirl and
Hi Jean,
>> +/*
>> + * Wait for patch from Jon Smirl
>> + * #include "powerpc-common.h"
>> + */
>
> It doesn't make sense to merge this comment upstream.
I know you don't like the patch from Jon Smirl and you also explained your
reasons.
Fortunately, I2c no longer uses numeric device IDs but na
Hallo Jochen,
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:54:01 +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Using the port of 2.4 code from Vitaly Bordug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and the actual algorithm used by the i2c driver of the DBox code on
> cvs.tuxboc.org from Tmbinc, Gillem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Renamed i2c-rpx.c and
> i2c-
Using the port of 2.4 code from Vitaly Bordug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and the actual algorithm used by the i2c driver of the DBox code on
cvs.tuxboc.org from Tmbinc, Gillem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Renamed i2c-rpx.c and
i2c-algo-8xx.c to i2c-cpm.c and converted the driver to an
of_platform_driver.
Signed-
11 matches
Mail list logo
