On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:01:02AM +, Li Xiubo wrote:
> > > The SGTL5000 is based on regulators and when it is disabled, there
> > > will be an error returns directly while the SGTL5000 codec is probing.
> > What makes you say this?
> static int ldo_regulator_register(struct snd_soc_codec *
> > The SGTL5000 is based on regulators and when it is disabled, there
> > will be an error returns directly while the SGTL5000 codec is probing.
>
> What makes you say this?
>
>From the code:
File path: "sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c"
==
#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
.
#else
static
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:59:53AM +, Li Xiubo wrote:
Please fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs.
> The SGTL5000 is based on regulators and when it is disabled, there
> will be an error returns directly while the SGTL5000 codec is probing.
What makes you say this? That's not how
> > On VF610 series there are no regulators used, and now whether the
> > CONFIG_REGULATOR mirco is enabled or not, for the VF610 audio patch
> > series, the board cannot be probe successfully.
> > And this patch will solve this issue.
>
> I don't understand what this is for at all, you're just sa
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:04:52PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> On VF610 series there are no regulators used, and now whether the
> CONFIG_REGULATOR mirco is enabled or not, for the VF610 audio
> patch series, the board cannot be probe successfully.
> And this patch will solve this issue.
I don't unde
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:04:52PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> On VF610 series there are no regulators used, and now whether the
> CONFIG_REGULATOR mirco is enabled or not, for the VF610 audio
micro? or macro?
> patch series, the board cannot be probe successfully.
> And this patch will solve this i
On VF610 series there are no regulators used, and now whether the
CONFIG_REGULATOR mirco is enabled or not, for the VF610 audio
patch series, the board cannot be probe successfully.
And this patch will solve this issue.
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li
---
sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c | 12
1
