On 2019-07-14, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 05:00:29PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > The basic property being guaranteed by LOOKUP_IN_ROOT is that it will
> > not result in resolution of a path component which was not inside the
> > root of the dirfd tree at some point during resoluti
On 2019-07-14, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 03:41:53AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 04:00:26PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:25:53PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > > > if (flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH) {
> > > > nd->root
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 05:00:29PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> The basic property being guaranteed by LOOKUP_IN_ROOT is that it will
> not result in resolution of a path component which was not inside the
> root of the dirfd tree at some point during resolution (and that all
> absolute symlink an
On 2019-07-12, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 01:55:52PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 01:39:24PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 08:57:45PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > @@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct
>
On 2019-07-13, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 04:00:26PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:25:53PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > > if (flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH) {
> > > nd->root = nd->path;
> > > if (!(flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
> > > p
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 03:41:53AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 04:00:26PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:25:53PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > > if (flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH) {
> > > nd->root = nd->path;
> > > if (!(flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 04:00:26PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:25:53PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > if (flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH) {
> > nd->root = nd->path;
> > if (!(flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
> > path_get(&nd->root);
> > e
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:25:53PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> if (flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH) {
> nd->root = nd->path;
> if (!(flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
> path_get(&nd->root);
> else
> nd->root_seq = nd->seq;
BTW, thi
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 01:55:52PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 01:39:24PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 08:57:45PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> >
> > > > > @@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata
> > > > > *nd, unsigned flags)
>
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 01:39:24PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 08:57:45PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata
> > > > *nd, unsigned flags)
> > > > s = ERR_PTR(error);
> > > >
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 08:57:45PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > > @@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd,
> > > unsigned flags)
> > > s = ERR_PTR(error);
> > > return s;
> > > }
> > > - error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
> > > - if (unli
On 2019-07-12, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 12:57:32AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > @@ -1442,8 +1464,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
> >
> > while (1) {
> > - if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> > +
On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 12:57:32AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> @@ -1442,8 +1464,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
>
> while (1) {
> - if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> + if (path_equal(&nd->path,
Add the following flags to allow various restrictions on path
resolution (these affect the *entire* resolution, rather than just the
final path component -- as is the case with most other AT_* flags).
The primary justification for these flags is to allow for programs to be
far more strict about ho
14 matches
Mail list logo
