On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:26:07 +
Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 28 December 2017 at 16:19, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:50:33 +
> > Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> >> static inline jump_label_t jump_entry_code(const struct jump_entry *entry)
> >> {
> >> - return entry-
On 28 December 2017 at 16:19, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:50:33 +
> Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>> static inline jump_label_t jump_entry_code(const struct jump_entry *entry)
>> {
>> - return entry->code;
>> + return (jump_label_t)&entry->code + entry->code;
>
> I'm pa
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:50:33 +
Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> static inline jump_label_t jump_entry_code(const struct jump_entry *entry)
> {
> - return entry->code;
> + return (jump_label_t)&entry->code + entry->code;
I'm paranoid about doing arithmetic on abstract types. What happens in
Similar to the arm64 case, 64-bit x86 can benefit from using 32-bit
relative references rather than 64-bit absolute ones when emitting
struct jump_entry instances. Not only does this reduce the memory
footprint of the entries themselves by 50%, it also removes the need
for carrying relocation metad
