On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 4:01 PM Peter Xu wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:06:30PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> > On 20 May 2021, at 10:57, Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:07:57PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > >> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes:
> > >>
> > >>> On 5/20/21 6:16 PM
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:06:30PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 20 May 2021, at 10:57, Peter Xu wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:07:57PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes:
> >>
> >>> On 5/20/21 6:16 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:56:54PM +053
On 20 May 2021, at 10:57, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:07:57PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes:
>>
>>> On 5/20/21 6:16 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:56:54PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> This seems to work at least for my u
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:07:57PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes:
>
> > On 5/20/21 6:16 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:56:54PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This seems to work at least for my userfaultfd test on shmem, however I
> do
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes:
> On 5/20/21 6:16 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
>> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:56:54PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
This seems to work at least for my userfaultfd test on shmem, however I
don't
fully understand the commit message [1] on: How do we guarantee we're
On 5/20/21 6:16 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:56:54PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
This seems to work at least for my userfaultfd test on shmem, however I don't
fully understand the commit message [1] on: How do we guarantee we're not
moving a thp pte?
move_page_tables() ch
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:56:54PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > This seems to work at least for my userfaultfd test on shmem, however I
> > don't
> > fully understand the commit message [1] on: How do we guarantee we're not
> > moving a thp pte?
> >
>
> move_page_tables() checks for pmd_tr
On 5/20/21 7:48 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:16:07AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:17AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
pmd/pud_populate is the right interface to be used to set the respective
page table entries. Some architectures like ppc64 do a
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:16:07AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:17AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> pmd/pud_populate is the right interface to be used to set the respective
> >> page table entries. Some architectures like ppc64 do assume that
> >> set_pmd/p
On 5/18/2021 9:46 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Nathan Chancellor writes:
Hi Aneesh,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:17AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
pmd/pud_populate is the right interface to be used to set the respective
page table entries. Some architectures like ppc64 do assume that set_p
Nathan Chancellor writes:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:17AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> pmd/pud_populate is the right interface to be used to set the respective
>> page table entries. Some architectures like ppc64 do assume that
>> set_pmd/pud_at
>> can only be used to se
Hi Aneesh,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:17AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> pmd/pud_populate is the right interface to be used to set the respective
> page table entries. Some architectures like ppc64 do assume that
> set_pmd/pud_at
> can only be used to set a hugepage PTE. Since we are not se
pmd/pud_populate is the right interface to be used to set the respective
page table entries. Some architectures like ppc64 do assume that set_pmd/pud_at
can only be used to set a hugepage PTE. Since we are not setting up a hugepage
PTE here, use the pmd/pud_populate interface.
Signed-off-by: Anees
13 matches
Mail list logo