On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 17:36 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Good, I think this should work as you want now. Can you allocate it like
> lppacas? Put it under PSERIES (and in the paca) and check for !HV?
Sure, I will do that.
> Oh and while there, could you prefix the name with rtas_?
Sure, repl
Excerpts from Nicholas Piggin's message of May 16, 2020 5:36 pm:
> Excerpts from Leonardo Bras's message of May 16, 2020 3:21 pm:
>> @@ -202,6 +220,7 @@ void __init __nostackprotector initialise_paca(struct
>> paca_struct *new_paca, int
>> /* For now -- if we have threads this will be adjuste
Hi Leonardo,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc5 next-20200515]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option
Excerpts from Leonardo Bras's message of May 16, 2020 3:21 pm:
> Implement rtas_call_reentrant() for reentrant rtas-calls:
> "ibm,int-on", "ibm,int-off",ibm,get-xive" and "ibm,set-xive".
>
> On LoPAPR Version 1.1 (March 24, 2016), from 7.3.10.1 to 7.3.10.4,
> items 2 and 3 say:
>
> 2 - For the P
Implement rtas_call_reentrant() for reentrant rtas-calls:
"ibm,int-on", "ibm,int-off",ibm,get-xive" and "ibm,set-xive".
On LoPAPR Version 1.1 (March 24, 2016), from 7.3.10.1 to 7.3.10.4,
items 2 and 3 say:
2 - For the PowerPC External Interrupt option: The * call must be
reentrant to the number
