On 11/07/25 11:20, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Tangential discussion: I was looking at this and was wondering why we
> need a "tl->flags" when there is already sd_flags() function and we can
> simply add SD_OVERLAP to sd_numa_flags().
>
> I think "tl->flags" was needed when the idea of overlap domains
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:20:30AM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> On 7/10/2025 4:27 PM, Li Chen wrote:
> > /*
> > * .. and append 'j' levels of NUMA goodness.
> > */
> > for (j = 1; j < nr_levels; i++, j++) {
> > - tl[i] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
> > -
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 06:57:07PM +0800, Li Chen wrote:
> From: Li Chen
>
> Define a small SDTL_INIT(maskfn, flagsfn, name) macro and use it to build the
> sched_domain_topology_level array. Purely a cleanup; behaviour is unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Chen
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner
>
On 7/10/2025 4:27 PM, Li Chen wrote:
> /*
>* .. and append 'j' levels of NUMA goodness.
>*/
> for (j = 1; j < nr_levels; i++, j++) {
> - tl[i] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
> - .mask = sd_numa_mask,
> - .sd_fl
From: Li Chen
Define a small SDTL_INIT(maskfn, flagsfn, name) macro and use it to build the
sched_domain_topology_level array. Purely a cleanup; behaviour is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Li Chen
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 34 +++
