Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] net: mv643xx_eth DT support and fixes

2013-05-31 Thread David Miller
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 08:28:58 +0200 > thanks for pulling these in. I finally found how to check if a patch > already went into -stable. As Jason already said, the mdio patch that > #1 fixes did not yet went into -stable. Can you unqueue it? Sorry for > the confusion.

Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] net: mv643xx_eth DT support and fixes

2013-05-30 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 05/31/2013 02:55 AM, David Miller wrote: From: Sebastian Hesselbarth Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:32:42 +0200 For the patches above I suggest to take Patches 1-6 through David Miller's branch, and Patches 7-12 through Jason Cooper's when the former have appeared on mainline linux. The patch set

Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] net: mv643xx_eth DT support and fixes

2013-05-30 Thread David Miller
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:32:42 +0200 > For the patches above I suggest to take Patches 1-6 through David > Miller's branch, and Patches 7-12 through Jason Cooper's when the > former have appeared on mainline linux. The patch set has been based > on v3.10-rc3. Patches

[PATCH v5 00/13] net: mv643xx_eth DT support and fixes

2013-05-29 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
This patch set picks up work by Florian Fainelli bringing full DT support to mv643xx_eth and Marvell SoCs using it. The current v5 patch set drops 1:1 compatibiliy with PPC binding for two reasons: (a) PPC parses DT nodes in arch/ppc/sysdev and creates non-DT platform_devices itself, (b) prope