Hi Wolfgang,
On Monday 05 January 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > IIRC (I didn't write the original version of this driver) then this
> > comments simply refers to the fact that the platform can select a maximum
> > SPI frequency via spi->max_speed_hz which is pretty obvious. So I'll just
> > remov
Hi Anton,
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > This adds a SPI driver for the SPI controller found in the IBM/AMCC
> > 4xx PowerPC's.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Ocker
> > Acked-by: Josh Boyer
> > ---
>
> [...]
>
> > +static unsigned int of_
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:48:08PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> This adds a SPI driver for the SPI controller found in the IBM/AMCC
> 4xx PowerPC's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Ocker
> Acked-by: Josh Boyer
> ---
[...]
> +static unsigned int of_num_gpios
Dear Stefan,
In message <200901051912.25874...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > > + /* Write new configration */
> > > + out_8(&hw->regs->mode, cs->mode);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Allow platform reduce the interrupt load on the CPU during SPI
> > > + * transfers. We do not target maximum performanc
On Saturday 27 December 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 November 2008, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Don't call setupxfer() from setup() so that the baudrate etc
> > won't get changed while another transfer is active, as suggested
> > by David Brownell.
>
> Better, bu
Hi David, Stefan,
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 11:32:25 -0800 David Brownell wrote:
>
> Also:
>
> > +static struct of_platform_driver spi_ppc4xx_of_driver = {
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>
> I'd hope the PPC folk eliminate this duplication soonish.
> Those fields a
Also:
> +static struct of_platform_driver spi_ppc4xx_of_driver = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
I'd hope the PPC folk eliminate this duplication soonish.
Those fields are obvious duplicates of the driver model
fields...
> + .match_table = spi_ppc4xx_of_ma
On Tuesday 25 November 2008, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Changes in v5:
> - Don't call setupxfer() from setup() so that the baudrate etc
> won't get changed while another transfer is active, as suggested
> by David Brownell.
Better, but this still doesn't seem quite right:
> +static int spi_ppc4xx
Steven A. Falco wrote:
> Stefan Roese wrote:
>> This adds a SPI driver for the SPI controller found in the IBM/AMCC
>> 4xx PowerPC's.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Ocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Acked-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>
> How
Stefan Roese wrote:
> This adds a SPI driver for the SPI controller found in the IBM/AMCC
> 4xx PowerPC's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Ocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
I have a question as to how to use th
This adds a SPI driver for the SPI controller found in the IBM/AMCC
4xx PowerPC's.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Ocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Changes in v5:
- Don't call setupxfer() from setup() so that the baudrat
11 matches
Mail list logo
