On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 07:32:52PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.12.24 00:11, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:31:25PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 17.12.24 06:13, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > > > The procfs mmu files such as smaps currently ignore device da
On 19.12.24 00:11, Alistair Popple wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:31:25PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 17.12.24 06:13, Alistair Popple wrote:
The procfs mmu files such as smaps currently ignore device dax and fs
dax pages because these pages are considered special. To maintain
existing
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:31:25PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 17.12.24 06:13, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > The procfs mmu files such as smaps currently ignore device dax and fs
> > dax pages because these pages are considered special. To maintain
> > existing behaviour once these pages are
On 17.12.24 06:13, Alistair Popple wrote:
The procfs mmu files such as smaps currently ignore device dax and fs
dax pages because these pages are considered special. To maintain
existing behaviour once these pages are treated as normal pages and
returned from vm_normal_page() add tests to explici
The procfs mmu files such as smaps currently ignore device dax and fs
dax pages because these pages are considered special. To maintain
existing behaviour once these pages are treated as normal pages and
returned from vm_normal_page() add tests to explicitly skip them.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Popp
