> On 9 Feb 2023, at 10:14 am, Rohan McLure wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 8 Feb 2023, at 11:23 pm, Christophe Leroy
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 08/02/2023 à 04:21, Rohan McLure a écrit :
>>> KCSAN instruments calls to atomic builtins, and will in turn call these
>>> builtins itself. As such, architect
> On 8 Feb 2023, at 11:23 pm, Christophe Leroy
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 08/02/2023 à 04:21, Rohan McLure a écrit :
>> KCSAN instruments calls to atomic builtins, and will in turn call these
>> builtins itself. As such, architectures supporting KCSAN must have
>> compiler support for these atomic
Le 08/02/2023 à 04:21, Rohan McLure a écrit :
> KCSAN instruments calls to atomic builtins, and will in turn call these
> builtins itself. As such, architectures supporting KCSAN must have
> compiler support for these atomic primitives.
>
> Since 32-bit systems are unlikely to have 64-bit compil
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:22 PM Rohan McLure wrote:
>
> KCSAN instruments calls to atomic builtins, and will in turn call these
> builtins itself. As such, architectures supporting KCSAN must have
> compiler support for these atomic primitives.
>
> Since 32-bit systems are unlikely to have 64-bit c
KCSAN instruments calls to atomic builtins, and will in turn call these
builtins itself. As such, architectures supporting KCSAN must have
compiler support for these atomic primitives.
Since 32-bit systems are unlikely to have 64-bit compiler builtins,
provide a stub for each missing builtin, and
