On 2/22/2016 8:46 AM, Frederic Barrat wrote:
Le 21/02/2016 23:30, Manoj Kumar a écrit :
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/18] cxl: IRQ allocation for guests
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:39:01 +0100
From: Frederic Barrat
To: imun...@au1.ibm.com, michael.neul...@au1.ibm.com,
m...@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev
Le 21/02/2016 23:30, Manoj Kumar a écrit :
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/18] cxl: IRQ allocation for guests
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:39:01 +0100
From: Frederic Barrat
To: imun...@au1.ibm.com, michael.neul...@au1.ibm.com,
m...@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
The PSL interrupt is not
Fred: See comment below.
---
Manoj Kumar
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/18] cxl: IRQ allocation for guests
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:39:01 +0100
From: Frederic Barrat
To: imun...@au1.ibm.com, michael.neul...@au1.ibm.com,
m...@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
The PSL interrupt is not
The PSL interrupt is not going to be multiplexed in a guest, so an
interrupt will be allocated for it for each context. It will still be
the first interrupt found in the first interrupt range, but is treated
almost like any other AFU interrupt when creating/deleting the
context. Only the handler is
