Nathan Lynch writes:
> Nathan Lynch writes:
>> Michael Ellerman writes:
>>> Nathan Lynch writes:
Michael Ellerman writes:
> Nathan Lynch writes:
>> Michael Ellerman writes:
>>> Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
>>> writes:
From: Nathan Lynch
On RTAS
Nathan Lynch writes:
> Michael Ellerman writes:
>> Nathan Lynch writes:
>>> Michael Ellerman writes:
Nathan Lynch writes:
> Michael Ellerman writes:
>> Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
>> writes:
>>> From: Nathan Lynch
>>>
>>> On RTAS platforms there is a general restr
Michael Ellerman writes:
> Nathan Lynch writes:
>> Michael Ellerman writes:
>>> Nathan Lynch writes:
Michael Ellerman writes:
> Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
> writes:
>> From: Nathan Lynch
>>
>> On RTAS platforms there is a general restriction that the OS must not
>
Nathan Lynch writes:
> Michael Ellerman writes:
>> Nathan Lynch writes:
>>> Michael Ellerman writes:
Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
writes:
> From: Nathan Lynch
>
> On RTAS platforms there is a general restriction that the OS must not
> enter RTAS on more than one CPU at
Nathan Lynch writes:
> Alternatively, sys_rtas() could be refactored into locking and
> non-locking paths, e.g.
>
> static long __do_sys_rtas(struct rtas_function *func)
> {
> // [ ... acquire rtas_lock, enter RTAS, fetch any error etc ... ]
> }
Of course this conflicts with the code genera
Michael Ellerman writes:
> Nathan Lynch writes:
>> Michael Ellerman writes:
>>
>>> Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
>>> writes:
From: Nathan Lynch
On RTAS platforms there is a general restriction that the OS must not
enter RTAS on more than one CPU at a time. This low-level
Nathan Lynch writes:
> Michael Ellerman writes:
>
>> Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
>> writes:
>>> From: Nathan Lynch
>>>
>>> On RTAS platforms there is a general restriction that the OS must not
>>> enter RTAS on more than one CPU at a time. This low-level
>>> serialization requirement is satisfied
Nathan Lynch writes:
> Michael Ellerman writes:
>> Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
>> writes:
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
>>> index 1fc0b3fffdd1..52f2242d0c28 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
>>> @@ -196,6 +22
Michael Ellerman writes:
> Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
> writes:
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
>> index 1fc0b3fffdd1..52f2242d0c28 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
>> @@ -196,6 +224,12 @@ static struct rtas_func
Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
writes:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> index 1fc0b3fffdd1..52f2242d0c28 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> @@ -196,6 +224,12 @@ static struct rtas_function rtas_function_table[]
> __ro_
Michael Ellerman writes:
> Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
> writes:
>> From: Nathan Lynch
>>
>> On RTAS platforms there is a general restriction that the OS must not
>> enter RTAS on more than one CPU at a time. This low-level
>> serialization requirement is satisfied by holding a spin
>> lock (rtas
Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
writes:
> From: Nathan Lynch
>
> On RTAS platforms there is a general restriction that the OS must not
> enter RTAS on more than one CPU at a time. This low-level
> serialization requirement is satisfied by holding a spin
> lock (rtas_lock) across most RTAS function invo
"Aneesh Kumar K.V (IBM)" writes:
> Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
> writes:
>> There should be no perceivable change introduced here except that
>> concurrent callers of the same RTAS function via sys_rtas() may block
>> on a mutex instead of spinning on rtas_lock. Changes to follow will
>> add rtas_f
Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
writes:
> From: Nathan Lynch
>
> On RTAS platforms there is a general restriction that the OS must not
> enter RTAS on more than one CPU at a time. This low-level
> serialization requirement is satisfied by holding a spin
> lock (rtas_lock) across most RTAS function inv
From: Nathan Lynch
On RTAS platforms there is a general restriction that the OS must not
enter RTAS on more than one CPU at a time. This low-level
serialization requirement is satisfied by holding a spin
lock (rtas_lock) across most RTAS function invocations.
However, some pseries RTAS functions
15 matches
Mail list logo
