Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-02 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
On 3/2/23 11:06, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: Hi Arnd, On 3/2/23 10:35, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the RISC-V port.  In theory that's a UABI break, as COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is the maximum length of /proc/cmdline and userspace could staticly

Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-02 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
On 3/2/23 11:44, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Alex, On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 11:09 AM Alexandre Ghiti wrote: On 3/2/23 10:47, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:35 AM Alexandre Ghiti wrote: This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the RISC-V port.

Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-02 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Alex, On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 11:09 AM Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > On 3/2/23 10:47, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:35 AM Alexandre Ghiti > > wrote: > >> This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the > >> RISC-V port. In theory that's a UABI brea

Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-02 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
Hi Geert, On 3/2/23 10:47, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Alex, On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:35 AM Alexandre Ghiti wrote: This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the RISC-V port. In theory that's a UABI break, as COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is the maximum length of /proc/cmdline

Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-02 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
Hi Arnd, On 3/2/23 10:35, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the RISC-V port. In theory that's a UABI break, as COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is the maximum length of /proc/cmdline and userspace could staticly rely on that to be correct. Usually I wou

Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-02 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Alex, On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:35 AM Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the > RISC-V port. In theory that's a UABI break, as COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is the > maximum length of /proc/cmdline and userspace could staticly rely on > that to be c

[PATCH v4 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-02 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the RISC-V port. In theory that's a UABI break, as COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is the maximum length of /proc/cmdline and userspace could staticly rely on that to be correct. Usually I wouldn't mess around with changing this sort of thing,