Srikar Dronamraju writes:
> * Srikar Dronamraju [2023-11-09 11:19:28]:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>> PowerVM systems configured in shared processors mode have some unique
>> challenges. Some device-tree properties will be missing on a shared
>> processor. Hence some sched domains may not make sense for s
Srikar Dronamraju writes:
> * Srikar Dronamraju [2023-11-09 11:19:28]:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>> PowerVM systems configured in shared processors mode have some unique
>> challenges. Some device-tree properties will be missing on a shared
>> processor. Hence some sched domains may not make sense for sh
* Srikar Dronamraju [2023-11-09 11:19:28]:
Hi Michael,
> PowerVM systems configured in shared processors mode have some unique
> challenges. Some device-tree properties will be missing on a shared
> processor. Hence some sched domains may not make sense for shared processor
> systems.
>
>
Did
* Aneesh Kumar K.V [2023-11-15 11:24:59]:
> Srikar Dronamraju writes:
>
> > PowerVM systems configured in shared processors mode have some unique
> > challenges. Some device-tree properties will be missing on a shared
> > processor. Hence some sched domains may not make sense for shared process
Srikar Dronamraju writes:
> PowerVM systems configured in shared processors mode have some unique
> challenges. Some device-tree properties will be missing on a shared
> processor. Hence some sched domains may not make sense for shared processor
> systems.
>
> Most shared processor systems are ov
PowerVM systems configured in shared processors mode have some unique
challenges. Some device-tree properties will be missing on a shared
processor. Hence some sched domains may not make sense for shared processor
systems.
Most shared processor systems are over-provisioned. Underlying PowerVM
Hype
