On 2021/10/26 上午10:42, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:09:12 +0800
> 王贇 wrote:
>
>> Just a ping, to see if there are any more comments :-P
>
> I guess you missed what went into mainline (and your name found a bug
> in my perl script for importing patches ;-)
>
> https://lore
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:09:12 +0800
王贇 wrote:
> Just a ping, to see if there are any more comments :-P
I guess you missed what went into mainline (and your name found a bug
in my perl script for importing patches ;-)
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211019091344.65629...@gandalf.local.home/
Whic
Just a ping, to see if there are any more comments :-P
Regards,
Michael Wang
On 2021/10/18 上午11:38, 王贇 wrote:
> The testing show that perf_ftrace_function_call() are using smp_processor_id()
> with preemption enabled, all the checking on CPU could be wrong after
> preemption.
>
> As Peter point
The testing show that perf_ftrace_function_call() are using smp_processor_id()
with preemption enabled, all the checking on CPU could be wrong after
preemption.
As Peter point out, the section between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock/unlock()
pair require the preemption to be disabled as
'Documenta
