On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 06:42:55 UTC, afzal mohammed wrote:
> request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq()
> occur after memory allocators are ready.
>
> Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocators were not
> ready by the time early interrupts were initi
afzal mohammed writes:
> Hi Michael Ellerman,
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:12:55PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote:
>> request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq()
>> occur after memory allocators are ready.
>>
>> Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocato
Hi Michael Ellerman,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:12:55PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote:
> request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq()
> occur after memory allocators are ready.
>
> Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocators were not
> ready by the tim
request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq()
occur after memory allocators are ready.
Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocators were not
ready by the time early interrupts were initialized.
Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq().
[1] https://lk
