On 2017/10/10 09:03AM, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
> * Naveen N. Rao wrote (on 2017-10-09
> 10:39:18 +):
>
> > On 2017/10/09 08:09AM, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
[snip]
> > > + add r3,r3,r0
> > > + ld r0,CFG_TB_UPDATE_COUNT(r3)
> > > + cmpld cr0,r0,r8 /* check if updated */
* Naveen N. Rao wrote (on 2017-10-09 10:39:18
+):
> On 2017/10/09 08:09AM, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
> > Current vDSO64 implementation does not have support for coarse clocks
> > (CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE), for which it falls back
> > to system call, increasing the response
On 2017/10/09 08:09AM, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
> Current vDSO64 implementation does not have support for coarse clocks
> (CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE), for which it falls back
> to system call, increasing the response time, vDSO implementation reduces
> the cycle time. Below is a b
Current vDSO64 implementation does not have support for coarse clocks
(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE), for which it falls back
to system call, increasing the response time, vDSO implementation reduces
the cycle time. Below is a benchmark of the difference in execution times.
(Non-c
