On 7/11/23 9:14 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.07.23 17:40, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
>> On 7/11/23 8:56 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 11.07.23 06:48, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Radix vmemmap mapping can map things correctly at the PMD level or PTE
level based on different device b
On 11.07.23 17:40, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
On 7/11/23 8:56 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 11.07.23 06:48, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Radix vmemmap mapping can map things correctly at the PMD level or PTE
level based on different device boundary checks. Hence we skip the
restrictions w.r.t vmemmap
On 7/11/23 8:56 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.07.23 06:48, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Radix vmemmap mapping can map things correctly at the PMD level or PTE
>> level based on different device boundary checks. Hence we skip the
>> restrictions w.r.t vmemmap size to be multiple of PMD_SIZE. Th
On 11.07.23 06:48, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Radix vmemmap mapping can map things correctly at the PMD level or PTE
level based on different device boundary checks. Hence we skip the
restrictions w.r.t vmemmap size to be multiple of PMD_SIZE. This also
makes the feature widely useful because to use
Radix vmemmap mapping can map things correctly at the PMD level or PTE
level based on different device boundary checks. Hence we skip the
restrictions w.r.t vmemmap size to be multiple of PMD_SIZE. This also
makes the feature widely useful because to use PMD_SIZE vmemmap area we
require a memory bl
