Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:18:34PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Could you please provide more explicit explanation why inlining such an
>> helper is considered as bad practice and messy ?
>
> Because now we get architectures to all subly differ. Look at the mess
>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:18:34PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Could you please provide more explicit explanation why inlining such an
> helper is considered as bad practice and messy ?
Because now we get architectures to all subly differ. Look at the mess
for ioremap and the ioremap* varian
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:18:34PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Could you please provide more explicit explanation why inlining such an
> helper is considered as bad practice and messy ?
Tom already told you to look at the previous threads. Let's read them
together. This one, for example:
htt
Le 15/09/2021 à 12:08, Borislav Petkov a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:28:59AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
I don't love it, a new C file and an out-of-line call to then call back
to a static inline that for most configuration will return false ... but
whatever :)
Yeah, hch thinks it
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:28:59AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> I don't love it, a new C file and an out-of-line call to then call back
> to a static inline that for most configuration will return false ... but
> whatever :)
Yeah, hch thinks it'll cause a big mess otherwise:
https://lore.kern
Borislav Petkov writes:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:58:35PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> Introduce a powerpc version of the cc_platform_has() function. This will
>> be used to replace the powerpc mem_encrypt_active() implementation, so
>> the implementation will initially only support the CC_ATT
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Yes, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20210914123919.58203...@canb.auug.org.au/T/#t
Aha, more compiler magic stuff ;-\
Oh well, I guess that fix will land upstream soon.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://pe
Le 14/09/2021 à 13:58, Borislav Petkov a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:58:35PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
Introduce a powerpc version of the cc_platform_has() function. This will
be used to replace the powerpc mem_encrypt_active() implementation, so
the implementation will initially only
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:58:35PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Introduce a powerpc version of the cc_platform_has() function. This will
> be used to replace the powerpc mem_encrypt_active() implementation, so
> the implementation will initially only support the CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT
> attribute.
>
On 9/8/21 10:58 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
Introduce a powerpc version of the cc_platform_has() function. This will
be used to replace the powerpc mem_encrypt_active() implementation, so
the implementation will initially only support the CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT
attribute.
Cc: Michael Ellerman
Cc: B
Introduce a powerpc version of the cc_platform_has() function. This will
be used to replace the powerpc mem_encrypt_active() implementation, so
the implementation will initially only support the CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT
attribute.
Cc: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Paul Mackerras
Si
11 matches
Mail list logo
