Hi Michael,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:51:10PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Gautham R. Shenoy" writes:
>
> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
> >
> > The power9_idle_stop method currently takes only the requested stop
> > level as a parameter and picks up the rest of the PSSCR bits from a
> > han
"Gautham R. Shenoy" writes:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>
> The power9_idle_stop method currently takes only the requested stop
> level as a parameter and picks up the rest of the PSSCR bits from a
> hand-coded macro. This is not a very flexible design, especially when
> the firmware has the cap
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
The power9_idle_stop method currently takes only the requested stop
level as a parameter and picks up the rest of the PSSCR bits from a
hand-coded macro. This is not a very flexible design, especially when
the firmware has the capability to communicate the psscr value an