Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node()

On 07/30/2015 07:41 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:34:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id(). Won't it fall through to the next cl

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node()

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, > so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id(). > > Suggested-by: Christoph Lameter > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka > Acked-by: David Rientjes > Ack

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node()

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:34:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, > so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id(). Won't it fall through to the next closest memory node in the zonelist anyway? Is th

[PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node()

numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id(). Suggested-by: Christoph Lameter Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: David Rientjes Acked-by: Mel Gorman --- include/linux/gfp.h | 5 +++-- 1 f