Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dmaengine: mpc512x: initialize with subsys_initcall()

2015-10-07 Thread Alexander Popov
On 07.10.2015 17:17, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:28:57PM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote: >> Initialize Freescale MPC512x DMA driver with subsys_initcall() >> to allow the depending drivers to call dma_request_slave_channel() >> during their probe. > > Why can't we use defered prob

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dmaengine: mpc512x: initialize with subsys_initcall()

2015-10-07 Thread Vinod Koul
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:28:57PM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote: > Initialize Freescale MPC512x DMA driver with subsys_initcall() > to allow the depending drivers to call dma_request_slave_channel() > during their probe. Why can't we use defered probe ? I have been asking people to not move init l

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dmaengine: mpc512x: initialize with subsys_initcall()

2015-09-28 Thread Alexander Popov
On 25.09.2015 03:16, Timur Tabi wrote: > Alexander Popov wrote: >> Initialize Freescale MPC512x DMA driver with subsys_initcall() >> to allow the depending drivers to call dma_request_slave_channel() >> during their probe. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov > > Is there any way we can use -EPROB

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dmaengine: mpc512x: initialize with subsys_initcall()

2015-09-24 Thread Timur Tabi
Alexander Popov wrote: Initialize Freescale MPC512x DMA driver with subsys_initcall() to allow the depending drivers to call dma_request_slave_channel() during their probe. Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov Is there any way we can use -EPROBEDEFER instead?

[PATCH v3 3/3] dmaengine: mpc512x: initialize with subsys_initcall()

2015-09-24 Thread Alexander Popov
Initialize Freescale MPC512x DMA driver with subsys_initcall() to allow the depending drivers to call dma_request_slave_channel() during their probe. Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov --- drivers/dma/mpc512x_dma.c | 12 +++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/driv