On (Fri) 11 Nov 2011 [14:57:20], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:44:58 -0800, Miche Baker-Harvey
> wrote:
> > Some modifications of vtermno were not done under the spinlock.
> >
> > Moved assignment from vtermno and increment of vtermno together,
> > putting both under the spinlock
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:44:58 -0800, Miche Baker-Harvey wrote:
> Some modifications of vtermno were not done under the spinlock.
>
> Moved assignment from vtermno and increment of vtermno together,
> putting both under the spinlock. Revert vtermno on failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miche Baker-Harve
Some modifications of vtermno were not done under the spinlock.
Moved assignment from vtermno and increment of vtermno together,
putting both under the spinlock. Revert vtermno on failure.
Signed-off-by: Miche Baker-Harvey
---
drivers/char/virtio_console.c |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6
