David Woodhouse writes:
> From: David Woodhouse
>
> It's all fairly baroque but in the end, I don't think there's any reason
> for $(KVM)/irqchip.o to have been handled differently, as they all end
> up in $(kvm-y) in the end anyway, regardless of whether they get there
> via $(common-objs-y) and
From: David Woodhouse
It's all fairly baroque but in the end, I don't think there's any reason
for $(KVM)/irqchip.o to have been handled differently, as they all end
up in $(kvm-y) in the end anyway, regardless of whether they get there
via $(common-objs-y) and the CPU-specific object lists.
Sig
