Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/15/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Domen Puncer wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> If there are no objections, I would like to get this merged
>>> when bestcomm goes in (any time now?).
>>>
>>> It's split into four parts:
>>> 1 - device tree
>>> 2 - small bestcomm c
On 10/15/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Domen Puncer wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > If there are no objections, I would like to get this merged
> > when bestcomm goes in (any time now?).
> >
> > It's split into four parts:
> > 1 - device tree
> > 2 - small bestcomm change
> > 3 - the actua
On 10/15/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Domen Puncer wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > If there are no objections, I would like to get this merged
> > when bestcomm goes in (any time now?).
> >
> > It's split into four parts:
> > 1 - device tree
> > 2 - small bestcomm change
> > 3 - the actua
Domen Puncer wrote:
> Hello!
>
> If there are no objections, I would like to get this merged
> when bestcomm goes in (any time now?).
>
> It's split into four parts:
> 1 - device tree
> 2 - small bestcomm change
> 3 - the actual driver
> 4 - phy part of the driver
patches #3 and #4 need to be co
Hello!
If there are no objections, I would like to get this merged
when bestcomm goes in (any time now?).
It's split into four parts:
1 - device tree
2 - small bestcomm change
3 - the actual driver
4 - phy part of the driver
Domen
--
Domen Puncer | Research & Development
.