On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:50:45 -0700
Mike Kravetz wrote:
> v3 -
>Used weak attribute method of defining arch_hugetlb_valid_size.
> This eliminates changes to arch specific hugetlb.h files (Peter)
>Updated documentation (Peter, Randy)
>Fixed handling of implicitly specified gigantic
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 02:40:05PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 4/20/20 1:29 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 20:23, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >> On 4/20/20 8:34 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Reverted this series fixed many undefined behaviors on arm64 with the
> >>> config,
>
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 23:43, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> On 4/20/20 1:29 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 20:23, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >> On 4/20/20 8:34 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Reverted this series fixed many undefined behaviors on arm64 with the
> >>> config,
> >> While
On 4/20/20 1:29 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 20:23, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 4/20/20 8:34 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>>>
>>> Reverted this series fixed many undefined behaviors on arm64 with the
>>> config,
>> While rearranging the code (patch 3 in series), I made the incorrect
>>
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 20:23, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> On 4/20/20 8:34 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Apr 17, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >>
> >> Longpeng(Mike) reported a weird message from hugetlb command line
> >> processing
> >> and proposed a solution [1]. While the propose
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:20:23AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 4/20/20 8:34 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Apr 17, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >>
> >> Longpeng(Mike) reported a weird message from hugetlb command line
> >> processing
> >> and proposed a solution [1]. While
On 4/20/20 8:34 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 17, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>
>> Longpeng(Mike) reported a weird message from hugetlb command line processing
>> and proposed a solution [1]. While the proposed patch does address the
>> specific issue, there are other related iss
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> Longpeng(Mike) reported a weird message from hugetlb command line processing
> and proposed a solution [1]. While the proposed patch does address the
> specific issue, there are other related issues in command line processing.
> As hugetl
v3 -
Used weak attribute method of defining arch_hugetlb_valid_size.
This eliminates changes to arch specific hugetlb.h files (Peter)
Updated documentation (Peter, Randy)
Fixed handling of implicitly specified gigantic page preallocation
in existing code and removed documentation
