On Thursday 15 March 2012, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>
> Somewhat belatedly, I'm looking to push this through the "tile" tree.
> Andrew Morton has been keeping it in his tree but I figure I should push it
> since it directly affects "tile" and currently no one else.
Sounds good.
> However, it would
Somewhat belatedly, I'm looking to push this through the "tile" tree.
Andrew Morton has been keeping it in his tree but I figure I should push it
since it directly affects "tile" and currently no one else.
However, it would be nice if anyone could provide a Reviewed-by or Acked-by
on the patch.
When using the "compat" APIs, architectures will generally want to
be able to make direct syscalls to msgsnd(), shmctl(), etc., and
in the kernel we would want them to be handled directly by
compat_sys_xxx() functions, as is true for other compat syscalls.
However, for historical reasons, several
