Hi Uwe,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 08:46:19AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Shawn,
>
> > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
> > > > +#define cpu_is_mx25() (0)
> > > > +#define cpu_is_mx35() (0)
> > > > +#define cpu_is_mx51() (0)
> > > > +#define cpu_is_imx() (0)
> > > > +#else
> >
Hello Shawn,
> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
> > > +#define cpu_is_mx25()(0)
> > > +#define cpu_is_mx35()(0)
> > > +#define cpu_is_mx51()(0)
> > > +#define cpu_is_imx() (0)
> > > +#else
> > > +#define cpu_is_imx() (1)
> > > +#endif
> >
> > ... e.g. that looks a bit f
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:40:54PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:22:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
> > controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It merges
> > sdhci-of-esdhc.c into sdhci-esdhc.c, so
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:22:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
> controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It merges
> sdhci-of-esdhc.c into sdhci-esdhc.c, so that the same pair of
> .probe/.remove hook works with eSDHC for two
> +config MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC
> + bool
> + depends on MMC_SDHCI
> + select MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM
> + help
> + This selects SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC controller.
bool is not a good choice here, because if ESDHC_IMX is selected as a
module (-m), it will get converted here to buil
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:22:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
> controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It merges
> sdhci-of-esdhc.c into sdhci-esdhc.c, so that the same pair of
> .probe/.remove hook works with eSDHC for two
This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It merges
sdhci-of-esdhc.c into sdhci-esdhc.c, so that the same pair of
.probe/.remove hook works with eSDHC for two platforms.
As the results, sdhci-of-esdhc.c and sdhci-esdhc.h are
