On Friday 14 December 2007, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > >Maybe this desires its own header?
> >
> > It can be factored out if anything else ever uses it.
>
> It's just confusing to parse lbc-specific and nand-specific code
> placed in the same file.
In that case, you could argue for splitting the
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 01:33:41PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:56:24PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>+#if 0
> >>+#define ELBC_NAND_DEBUG_LVL 6
> >>+#endif
> >>+
> >>+#ifdef ELBC_NAND_DEBUG_LVL
> >>+static int fcm_debug_level = ELBC_NAND_DEBUG_LVL;
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:56:24PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
>> +#if 0
>> +#define ELBC_NAND_DEBUG_LVL 6
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#ifdef ELBC_NAND_DEBUG_LVL
>> +static int fcm_debug_level = ELBC_NAND_DEBUG_LVL;
>> +#define FCM_DEBUG(n, args...) \
>> +do {
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:56:24PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nick Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Respun according to feedback; also, fixed a couple direct accesses
> of iomem.
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig |9 +
> driv
Signed-off-by: Nick Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Respun according to feedback; also, fixed a couple direct accesses
of iomem.
drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig |9 +
drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile|1 +
drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 12
