Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] rheap: Changes config mechanism

2007-10-15 Thread Grant Likely
On 10/15/07, Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: > > >> If you turn on the QE but don't turn on RHEAP, the build will fail. > >> Do we want to allow that? > > > > nope. > > Is there any way to force RHEAP to be selected when it's a user-selectable > option? Yes, you just add

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] rheap: Changes config mechanism

2007-10-15 Thread Timur Tabi
Kumar Gala wrote: >> If you turn on the QE but don't turn on RHEAP, the build will fail. >> Do we want to allow that? > > nope. Is there any way to force RHEAP to be selected when it's a user-selectable option? -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale __

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] rheap: Changes config mechanism

2007-10-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 15, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: > >> I don't see why we can't let users select it (saying that >> differently, we should let users have this ability) > > If you turn on the QE but don't turn on RHEAP, the build will > fail. Do we want to allow that? nope.

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] rheap: Changes config mechanism

2007-10-15 Thread Timur Tabi
Kumar Gala wrote: > I don't see why we can't let users select it (saying that > differently, we should let users have this ability) If you turn on the QE but don't turn on RHEAP, the build will fail. Do we want to allow that? -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale ___

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] rheap: Changes config mechanism

2007-10-15 Thread Grant Likely
On 10/15/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > > On 10/15/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 13, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > >> > >>> From: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > >>> Instead of hav

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] rheap: Changes config mechanism

2007-10-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 15, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On 10/15/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Oct 13, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> >>> From: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> Instead of having in the makefile all the option that >>> requires rheap, we define

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] rheap: Changes config mechanism

2007-10-15 Thread Grant Likely
On 10/15/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 13, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > > > From: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Instead of having in the makefile all the option that > > requires rheap, we define a configuration symbol > > and when needed we make sure

Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] rheap: Changes config mechanism

2007-10-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 13, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > From: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Instead of having in the makefile all the option that > requires rheap, we define a configuration symbol > and when needed we make sure it's selected. > > Signed-off-by: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECT

[PATCH v2 2/7] rheap: Changes config mechanism

2007-10-13 Thread Grant Likely
From: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Instead of having in the makefile all the option that requires rheap, we define a configuration symbol and when needed we make sure it's selected. Signed-off-by: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/