On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 09:41:33PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 01:05:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > wrote:
> > Some users want a fully running gfx stack 2s after power-on. There's
> > not even enough time
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 01:05:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>> > Can they use initramfs for this ?
>>
>> Apparently that's also uncool with the embedded folks.
>
> Wh
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:10:52PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Cutting down since a lot of this is probably better discussed at
> ks/lpc. Aside, if you want to check out Chris Wilson's work on our new
> depency handling, it's called kfence.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/17/37
Thanks more rea
Cutting down since a lot of this is probably better discussed at
ks/lpc. Aside, if you want to check out Chris Wilson's work on our new
depency handling, it's called kfence.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/17/37
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > So .. I agree, let's avo
Summoning Felix for the embedded aspect on initramfs below.
Jörg might be interested in the async facilities you speak of as well.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 01:05:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:55:55AM +02
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:55:55AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>> > Thou shalt not make firmware calls early on init or probe.
>
> <-- snip -->
>
>> > There are 4 offende
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:55:55AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Thou shalt not make firmware calls early on init or probe.
<-- snip -->
> > There are 4 offenders at this time:
> >
> > mcgrof@ergon ~/linux-next (git::20160609)$ expor
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Thou shalt not make firmware calls early on init or probe.
>
> systemd already ripped support out for the usermode helper
> a while ago, there are still users that require the usermode helper,
> however systemd's use of the usermode help
Thou shalt not make firmware calls early on init or probe.
systemd already ripped support out for the usermode helper
a while ago, there are still users that require the usermode helper,
however systemd's use of the usermode helper exacerbated a long
lasting issue of the fact that we have many dri
