On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:18:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The IPC system call handling is highly inconsistent across architectures,
> some use sys_ipc, some use separate calls, and some use both. We also
> have some architectures that require passing IPC_64 in the flags, and
> others that s
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:20 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The IPC system call handling is highly inconsistent across architectures,
> some use sys_ipc, some use separate calls, and some use both. We also
> have some architectures that require passing IPC_64 in the flags, and
> others that set it imp
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:18:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The IPC system call handling is highly inconsistent across architectures,
> some use sys_ipc, some use separate calls, and some use both. We also
> have some architectures that require passing IPC_64 in the flags, and
> others that s
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 6:20 PM Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:18:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The IPC system call handling is highly inconsistent across architectures,
> > some use sys_ipc, some use separate calls, and some use both. We also
> > have some architect
The IPC system call handling is highly inconsistent across architectures,
some use sys_ipc, some use separate calls, and some use both. We also
have some architectures that require passing IPC_64 in the flags, and
others that set it implicitly.
For the additon of a y2083 safe semtimedop() system
