Breno Leitao writes:
> On 08/16/2018 09:49 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Michael Neuling writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 19:59 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Currently msr_tm_active() is a wrapper around MSR_TM_ACTIVE() if
CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is set, or it is just a function
Hi Michael,
On 08/16/2018 09:49 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Michael Neuling writes:
>
>> On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 19:59 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>>> Currently msr_tm_active() is a wrapper around MSR_TM_ACTIVE() if
>>> CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is set, or it is just a function that
>>> return
Michael Neuling writes:
> On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 19:59 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> Currently msr_tm_active() is a wrapper around MSR_TM_ACTIVE() if
>> CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is set, or it is just a function that
>> returns false if CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is not set.
>>
>> This funct
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 19:59 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Currently msr_tm_active() is a wrapper around MSR_TM_ACTIVE() if
> CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is set, or it is just a function that
> returns false if CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is not set.
>
> This function is not necessary, since MSR_T
Currently msr_tm_active() is a wrapper around MSR_TM_ACTIVE() if
CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is set, or it is just a function that
returns false if CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is not set.
This function is not necessary, since MSR_TM_ACTIVE() just do the same,
checking for the TS bits and does no