On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:11:58 -0600
, Nathan Fontenot
wrote:
> On 11/25/2014 05:07 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 22:33 +, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> The OF_RECONFIG notifier callback uses a different structure depending
> >> on whether it is a node change or a prope
On 11/25/2014 05:07 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 22:33 +, Grant Likely wrote:
>> The OF_RECONFIG notifier callback uses a different structure depending
>> on whether it is a node change or a property change. This is silly, and
>> not very safe. Rework the code to us
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 22:33 +, Grant Likely wrote:
> The OF_RECONFIG notifier callback uses a different structure depending
> on whether it is a node change or a property change. This is silly, and
> not very safe. Rework the code to use the same data structure regardless
> of the type of notif
The OF_RECONFIG notifier callback uses a different structure depending
on whether it is a node change or a property change. This is silly, and
not very safe. Rework the code to use the same data structure regardless
of the type of notifier.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
