Gautham R Shenoy writes:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:03:26PM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> "Gautham R. Shenoy" writes:
>> > This is the v2 of the fix to change the default behaviour of
>> > cede_offline.
>>
>> OK, but why keep the cede offline behavior at all? Can we remove it? I
>> think doing
Hello Nathan,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:03:26PM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> "Gautham R. Shenoy" writes:
> > This is the v2 of the fix to change the default behaviour of
> > cede_offline.
>
> OK, but why keep the cede offline behavior at all? Can we remove it? I
> think doing so would allow us
"Gautham R. Shenoy" writes:
> This is the v2 of the fix to change the default behaviour of
> cede_offline.
OK, but why keep the cede offline behavior at all? Can we remove it? I
think doing so would allow us to remove all the code that temporarily
onlines threads for partition migration.
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
This is the v2 of the fix to change the default behaviour of cede_offline.
The previous version can be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/12/222
The main change from v1 is that the patch2 to create a sysfs file to
report and control the value of cede_offline_enabl
